Tuesday, August 24, 2010

How Long To Work When Pregnant

Frontal21 - today by 21 clock: how victims become perpetrators be made .....

The cover story in the recently published Wissenschhaftsmagazin

brain & mind 9 / 2010: Courage is in short supply :

New Study: One in four German was already victims of violence in public. Psychologists to develop training programs for more civil courage
is now in the broadcast on ZDF Frontal21 still lit from a different perspective. For moral courage in our society also means that workers affected by even the "offender" may be used, must pay fines or are even in prison.


Preview
The topics on the program
Critical reports on politics, economy and society

reported in the next shipment Frontal21 among other things, moral courage in court - from victims to perpetrators; expensive school - No Abi for poor children; speculators to profit from the hunger - price gouging in cereals, the dispute over the Wartburg - World Heritage Site at windmills; worthy Dying at home - A law and reality. be
courage must be rewarded in our society and not punished My conclusion. Here, the legislature is asking others to create the necessary conditions, starting with the fact that perpetrators of the legal system and should not be used to find, helpers to make offenders.

The theme of "morality" leads of our justice system in the shadows. Looking at the "moral action system", ie, the injunction (in) essence which is to prevent alleged infringement of personal rights effective, reversed in many cases the protection of individual rights into a system of violation of personal rights and freedoms of where defendant

  • .... because for a preliminary injunction, the mere claim, one had been injured
  • ...... for a court order, the applicant needs in some cases not even a credible demonstration that the cause of action is actually ....

I see injunction: Mayor Ulrich Janssen, city funds against Monika Armand:

In the application for site 8, the lawyer, who became mayor Ass Jur Ulrich Janssen and Vormündin represents, suggests that:

" It is not for the applicant to establish that the allegations of the respondent are incorrect

this: court date 09.06.2010 - Injunction II. Mayor Ulrich Janssen / Monika Armand

..
and are a famous example of it here:
Legal disputes around Jan Ullrich
quote from it:

"August 2006: The molecular biologist and anti-doping fighter Werner Franke claimed Ullrich had paid EUR 35 000 for doping substances to Fuentes - a year later, he even speaks of 120 000 € . Ullrich obtained against the claim for an injunction before the Regional Court of Hamburg
[..]
August 13, 2010. The district court denies an injunction against Ullrich Franke, the board decided that the claim Franke, Ullrich have money. paid for doping, as "should be considered true". "

has four years did it take to Franke successfully against the injunction was by Jan Ulrich. For an injunction can only one to defend, who do have the necessary financial resources, so much of omission defendant - even though the injunction plaintiff / omission applicant, is wrong - are wrongly convicted and contribute to high court and legal costs. See for more details



Press Hamburg Chamber: Question of the plaintiff
The Flying jurisdiction needs a ban. Part V of the series "Abmahnrepublik"


continued on .......

0 comments:

Post a Comment